Participatory Budgeting

Project bank

The project bank is a participatory activity where participants present and evaluate ideas or initiatives to receive resources or support. It simulates a bank where "projects" compete for symbolic funding, and participants take on roles such as proponents, investors, or evaluators. This approach promotes collective decision-making and the development of viable, well-founded proposals.

Duration
From 90 to 120 minutes, depending on the number of projects and participants.
Participants
From 10 to 30 people, organized into small teams to develop and present projects.
Project bank

Preparation

01 · Define the purpose
    02 · Assign roles
    • Proponents: Present their projects.
    • Evaluators: Analyze and select projects.
    • Investors (optional): Allocate symbolic resources to projects.
    03 · Prepare materials
    • Forms or templates to describe projects.
    • Symbolic resources (coins, tokens, or points).
    • Physical or digital space for presentations.

    Step-by-step instructions

    1

    Introduction to the purpose

    • Explain the objective of the project bank and the roles each participant will play.
    • Present the basic rules for project presentations and resource allocation.
    2

    Project development

    • Proponents work individually or in teams to develop their projects.
    • They may use templates to structure their proposals, including:
      • Problem or need: What issue does it aim to solve?
      • Objective: What does it seek to achieve?
      • Expected impact: What results are anticipated?
      • Required resources: What financial or symbolic support is needed?
    3

    Presentation to the bank

    • Each proponent presents their project to the group (or a designated committee), explaining their proposal within a time limit (e.g., 3-5 minutes).
    • Evaluators or investors may ask questions to clarify any doubts.
    4

    Evaluation and resource allocation

    • Evaluators rate projects based on predefined criteria (e.g., impact, feasibility, originality).
    • Optional: Investors allocate symbolic resources to the projects they find most important or promising.
    5

    Analysis and feedback

    • Evaluators discuss the results and provide feedback to the proponents.
    • Selected or prioritized projects are announced.
    6

    Closing and future planning

    • Facilitate a group reflection on the learnings from the activity.
    • Establish concrete steps to implement or support the selected projects.

    Materials

    Paper and project templates.
    Symbolic resources (tokens, coins, points).
    Space for presentations (physical or digital).
    Digital tools

    Platforms

    For virtual sessions or collaborative documentation.

    Practical recommendations

    Clear criteria

    Define the evaluation criteria beforehand (e.g., impact, feasibility, innovation).

    Active facilitation

    Guide teams during project development to ensure clarity and focus.

    Constructive feedback

    Emphasize the strengths of proposals and areas for improvement.

    Documentation

    Record results and conclusions to follow up on selected projects.