Participatory BudgetingParticipatory EvaluationParticipatory InteractionParticipatory Planning

Impact and feasibility scale

Impact and feasibility scale
Duration
From 60 to 90 minutes, depending on the number of proposals and participants.
Participants
From 6 to 20 people, to ensure a manageable and diverse discussion.
Areas of application
Desarrollo comunitarioGestión organizacional y empresarialPlanificación urbana y ruralSalud y bienestar socialArte, cultura y creatividadSostenibilidad y medio ambientePolíticas públicas y gobernanzaInnovación y diseñoParticipación ciudadana y social
Participation level
ColaboraciónDecisión conjuntaEvaluación participativaGeneración de conocimiento
Target audience
Líderes comunitariosONGs y colectivos socialesEquipos empresarialesFuncionarios públicosDiseñadores creativos
The Impact and feasibility scale is a participatory activity designed to evaluate proposals or ideas based on their potential impact and ease of implementation (feasibility). Using a visual framework, participants position proposals on a matrix to prioritize those with the greatest benefit and feasibility, facilitating informed and strategic decision-making.

Preparation

  1. Define the objective: Identify the topic or context for applying the scale (e.g., community projects, innovative ideas, internal policies).
  2. Gather proposals: Collect the ideas to be evaluated, ensuring they are clearly defined and understandable for all participants.
  3. Prepare materials:
    • Draw a matrix on large paper, a whiteboard, or a digital tool with two axes:
      • Impact (from low to high).
      • Feasibility (from difficult to easy).
    • Prepare cards or sticky notes for each proposal.

Step-by-step instructions

  1. Introduction to the activity
    • Explain the purpose and how the matrix helps prioritize proposals.
    • Define key concepts:
      • Impact: The level of benefit or positive change the proposal generates.
      • Feasibility: The ease of implementation, considering resources, time, and capacities.
  2. Presentation of proposals
    • Read and briefly discuss each proposal with the group to ensure everyone understands them.
    • Distribute the cards or sticky notes with the proposals written on them.
  3. Collaborative construction of the matrix
    • Invite participants to position each proposal on the matrix based on their perception of its impact and feasibility.
    • Facilitate dialogue to reach consensus on the placement of proposals in cases of disagreement.
  4. Analysis of results
    • Observe and reflect with the group on the distribution of the proposals:
      • Which proposals fall into the high-impact and high-feasibility quadrant?
      • What should be done with proposals of low impact or low feasibility?
    • Classify proposals by priority:
      • High priority: High impact and high feasibility.
      • Strategic challenges: High impact but low feasibility.
      • Quick actions: Low impact but high feasibility.
  5. Define actions
    • Design strategies to implement the high-priority proposals.
    • Discuss ways to overcome feasibility barriers for high-impact proposals.
  6. Closure and documentation
    • Summarize key conclusions and prioritize next steps.
    • Document the results of the matrix and the proposed strategies.

Purpose

The purpose of the Impact and feasibility scale is to collaboratively and strategically prioritize proposals based on a structured analysis that combines potential benefits and ease of implementation. This tool promotes informed decision-making and focuses on high-value, feasible actions.

Required materials

  • Large paper or whiteboards to draw the matrix
  • Colored markers
  • Cards or sticky notes for the proposals

Platforms

Practical recommendations

  • Clarity in criteria: Ensure all participants understand what impact and feasibility mean in the specific context.
  • Active facilitation: Mediate in cases of disagreement and encourage dialogue to reach consensus.
  • Documentation: Save photos or screenshots of the final result for future reference.
  • Adaptability: If there are many proposals, pre-select a representative set.